{"id":455,"date":"2020-01-29T09:46:00","date_gmt":"2020-01-29T09:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/?p=455"},"modified":"2020-01-29T09:15:12","modified_gmt":"2020-01-29T09:15:12","slug":"searching-for-managerial-discretion-how-public-managers-engage-managerialism-as-a-rationalization-for-increased-latitude-of-action-artikel-i-vetenskaplig-tidskrift-refereegranskad-forfattare-tom-kar","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/artikel\/searching-for-managerial-discretion-how-public-managers-engage-managerialism-as-a-rationalization-for-increased-latitude-of-action-artikel-i-vetenskaplig-tidskrift-refereegranskad-forfattare-tom-kar\/","title":{"rendered":"Searching for managerial discretion: How public managers engage managerialism as a rationalization for increased latitude of action Artikel i vetenskaplig tidskrift, refereegranskad F\u00f6rfattare Tom Karlsson | F\u00f6rvaltningsh\u00f6gskolan Publikations\u00e5r 2019Publicerad i Public Management Review, 21 (3), 315-333"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>SammanfattningThis article focuses on the managerial discretion that public managers experience. More specifically, it discusses how managerialism is an embedded ideological stance that influences understandings of public sector governance. I argue that managers\u2019 perceptions of discretion are affected by these understandings. The analysis draws on empirical data from a longitudinal study, demonstrating how public managers engage discourses emanating from managerialism in order to rationalize increased discretion. The findings suggest that customer perspectives functions as a rationalizing factor for engaging public managers\u2019 transition towards increased discretion. As such, this article contributes to knowledge about managerial discretion as well as managerialism.L\u00e4nkar<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/14719037.2018.1473475\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/14719037.2018.1473475<\/a><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>ISSN1471-9037E-ISSN1471-9045\u00c4mnesord<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>SAMH\u00c4LLSVETENSKAP | Statsvetenskap<\/li><li>SAMH\u00c4LLSVETENSKAP | Ekonomi och n\u00e4ringsliv | F\u00f6retagsekonomi<\/li><li>SAMH\u00c4LLSVETENSKAP | Statsvetenskap | Studier av offentlig f\u00f6rvaltning<\/li><li>SAMH\u00c4LLSVETENSKAP | Ekonomi och n\u00e4ringsliv<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>NyckelordPublic management, managerialization, management as ideology, latitude of action, customersSpr\u00e5kEngelskaPublikations-ID268335Identifikatorer<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>DOI:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14719037.2018.1473475\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14719037.2018.1473475<\/a><\/li><li>Scopus-ID: 85047157526<\/li><\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SammanfattningThis article focuses on the managerial discretion that public managers experience. More specifically, it discusses how managerialism is an embedded ideological stance that influences understandings of public sector governance. I argue that managers\u2019 perceptions of discretion are affected by these understandings. The analysis draws on empirical data from a longitudinal study, demonstrating how public managers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[45,19,8],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=455"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":456,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/455\/revisions\/456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogg.sh.se\/forvaltningsakademin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}